MEMBER SIGN IN
Not a member? Become one today!
         iBerkshires     Berkshire Chamber     Berkshire Community College     City of Pittsfield    
Search
Del Gallo Challenges Democratic Candidates to Spending Limits
Campaign Statement,
04:41PM / Monday, June 27, 2016
Print | Email  

The following is an open letter from Rinaldo Del Gallo III, candidate for the Democratic nomination for state Senate:

During the first week of April, I sent my fellow candidates an email asking them to agree to voluntary spending limits.  Many progressives I have spoken to feel it is an excellent idea. I herein resubmit an open letter on the subject of spending limits, debates, and columns in local papers. This offer, previously submitted in early April, I offer for 10 days after publication of this letter by The Berkshire Eagle (on June 22).
 
Spending Limits

In early April, I was at an event with state Rep. Smitty Pignatelli and the subject of money and campaigns came up. He said that state Sen. Ben Downing spent $100,000 to get elected when he first ran for office in 2006. I also confirmed that Andrea Nuciforo spent similar amounts.
 
Please sit with that colossal dollar figure: $100,000. It is this daunting amount of money that has caused me to hesitate about throwing my hat into the ring.
 
There are several problems with raising such an astronomical sum to run for office.
 
First, potentially good candidates are not entering the race. Rep. Pignatelli openly stated that these huge figures are keeping people from running.
 
Second, when we raise such vast amounts of money, we owe people favors. Politics becomes less about people and more about campaign donors, especially large campaign donors. We all want to represent the poor and the diminishing middle class — not just people that can make campaign donations. I am campaigning as a "Bernie Sanders progressive." [Vermont's U.S. Sen.] Bernie Sanders has talked at great length about the evils of money and politics. But is my hope that getting money out of politics is something that all of us as Democrats can agree is not only a laudable goal but is essential to the body politic. If our government is going to be what Lincoln described as being "of the people, by the people, for the people," we need to get money out of politics. This is especially true of a state senate race which should be all about personal conversations, debates, and expression of views in local media.
 
Third, I want to spend from now until Thursday, Sept. 8, 2016, looking a voter in the eye and having a real conversation, not raising campaign donations. It represents too much of a theft of time. Politics should be about time with people, not raising money.
 
I propose a limit of around $20,000 but would entertain and even prefer lower amounts. I would entertain higher ones if you would not agree to a $20,000 campaign spending limit. But I want to know if you agree to any campaign spending limits of any kind or nature. It is the first policy decision you will have to make.
 
Here would be the parameters:
 
1. Both state senate candidates Adam Hinds and Andrea Harrington would have to agree for this agreement to apply to the Democratic primary.
 
2. There would be a limit on campaign contributions, but there would also be a limit on "independent" expenditures. Best faith efforts would have to be made to discourage such expenditures. The purpose would be to remove hard money and soft money.
 
3. The spending limit would be just that — a spending limit. We could agree to raise funds for the general campaign should the sole Republican challenger not agree to this agreement. (If the sole Republican does not agree to these terms, it would even enhance the Democrats chance at victory, since we would not expend money fighting each other in our primary.)
 
4. If I can get all other candidates on board that could appear in the general election, this agreement of spending limits would apply to the general election as well.
 
5.  Acceptance of this offer pertaining to campaign spending limits must be made in the next week after publication by The Berkshire Eagle.
 
When I first drafted this letter in early April and sent it to all my opponents (Democrat and Republican), I had not asked for one cent in a campaign contribution. The point is, progressives believe we need to take money out of politics and return it to the people. I hope you agree.
 
I believe that we as Democrats can make history and return democracy (with the little "d") to the people. Please join me in what could be a historic moment for democracy and its return to the people.
 
Debates
 
This should be an issues-driven race. I would also like to have debates or forums once per week until the election. There are numerous local organizations that would like to sponsor such debates and forums, and I am sure the media would cover it. I ask your express agreement to this offer.
 
Newspaper Columns
 
We would agree to ask to have local newspapers carry columns by all of us.
 
While I believe that we have a good group of Democratic candidates in Adams Hinds and Andrea Harrington, this open letter is extended to the Republican challenger, Chistine Canning.
 
Please accept this challenge in the upbeat, respectful and positive manner in which it is made. Let us change the face of democracy and give it back to the people.

Editor's note: iBerkshires publishes campaign statements and letters that adhere to our policies. All submissions are subject to editing for style, clarity and content.
 

Comments
More Featured Stories
Pittsfield.com is owned and operated by: Boxcar Media 106 Main Sreet, P.O. Box 1787 North Adams, MA 01247 -- T. 413-663-3384
© 2008 Boxcar Media LLC - All rights reserved